NTA-NET (Based on NTA-UGC) Psychology (Paper-II): Questions 4567 - 4568 of 5827

Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 5827 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. Subscription can be renewed yearly absolutely FREE! View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 800.00 or

How to register?

Question number: 4567

» Learning » Reinforcement

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2017

Assertion-Reason▾

Question

Assertion (Ꭺ)

Hull proposed that Reaction Potential is the product of Habit Strength and Drive (D) from this some testable prediction can be made about the rate of eye lid conditioning in relation to drive (January Paper 3)

Reason (Ꭱ)

Hull’s theory is based on Hypothetico-Deductive model which involved deducting testable consequences based on postulates.

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Ꭺ is false but Ꭱ is true

b.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are true and Ꭱ is the correct explanation of Ꭺ

c.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are true but Ꭱ is NOT the correct explanation of Ꭺ

d.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are false

Question number: 4568

» Statistics & Research Methods » Inferential Statistics

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2017

MCQ▾

Question

The multiple correlation of academic achievement with Numerical ability, Abstract reasoning, and Verbal ability was found to be 0.6. Which of the following statement/s would be true in this context?

  1. None of the three predictors would correlate more 0.6 with academic achievement.
  2. The three predictors together would explain 36 percent variance in academic achievement
  3. At least, one predictor would correlate 0.6 with academic achievement.
  4. The three predictors would explain 60 percent of variance in academic achievement (January Paper 3)

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

2 and 4 only

b.

1 and 2 only

c.

3 and 4 only

d.

2 only

Developed by: