NTA-NET (Based on NTA-UGC) Psychology (Paper-II): Questions 4987 - 4989 of 6630

Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 6630 questions. Access all new questions- tracking exam pattern and syllabus. View the complete topic-wise distribution of questions. Unlimited Access, Unlimited Time, on Unlimited Devices!

View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 850.00 -OR-

How to register? Already Subscribed?

Passage

Read the following paragraph and answer the five questions, which follow:

Scaling in psychology can be classified into two categories – psychophysical scaling and psychological scaling. Although psychological scaling had its origin in Fechner՚s method of first choices and the work on colour preference, the major work in psychological scaling began in 1920՚s in the context of attitude measurement. Bogardus Social Distance Scale (1925) is one of such first attempts. A major breakthrough in attitude scaling occurred when Thurstone developed his Law of Comparative Judgement (LCJ) and also proposed the three scaling methods- paired comparison, equal appearing intervals and successive intervals. In the paired comparison, every statement/stimulus is paired with every other statement/stimulus. The computational methods of paired comparison are most extensively developed, some of them using Thurston՚s LCJ directly for this purpose. Such pairing of statements/stimuli is not involved in methods of Equal Appearing Intervals (EAI) and Successive Intervals (SI) . Moreover, the distributions of the categories, assigned by the judges to each attitude statement in EAI and SI need not be normal; in fact the distributions for several statements are skewed. This situation requires some computational precautions. Moreover, the method of successive intervals was computationally quite laborious in pre-computer era and hence it was not so popular. In the classical scaling tradition, Guttmann developed the scalogram technique and Edwards developed the scale discrimination technique. Likert՚s development of summated ratings represent an important landmark in attitude measurement. It follows the traditional psychometric model. Aiken and Groth -Marnatt (2009) concluded that other scaling techniques, less frequently used for attitude measurement, include Osgood՚s semantic differential, Q-sort, expectancy value rating, magnitude estimation, multidimensional scaling etc.

(Paper 3 January)

Question 4987 (4 of 5 Based on Passage)

Appeared in Year: 2017

Question

Assertion-Reason▾

Assertion(Ꭺ)

The method of paired comparison is not suitable for scaling the large number of attitude statements.

Reason(Ꭱ)

In method of paired comparison, every attitude statement is paired with every other attitude statement.

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are true and Ꭱ is the correct explanation of Ꭺ

b.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are true but Ꭱ is NOT the correct explanation of Ꭺ

c.

Ꭺ is false but Ꭱ is true

d.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are false

Question 4988 (5 of 5 Based on Passage)

Appeared in Year: 2017

Question

MCQ▾

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate alternative.

It would be desirable to carry out the factor analysis of attitude scales obtained by method of________.

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Successive intervals

b.

Equal appearing intervals

c.

Paired comparison

d.

Summated ratings

Question 4989

Appeared in Year: 2017

Question

MCQ▾

Which of the following are the characteristics of Nomothetic approach to personality?

  1. Emphasis on variations in a person
  2. Interpretation of test scores
  3. Group norms
  4. General laws of personality (Paper 3 January)

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

1,2 and 4 only

b.

1,2, 3 and 4

c.

1,3 and 4 only

d.

2,3 and 4 only

Developed by: