NTA-NET (Based on NTA-UGC) Population Studies (Paper-II): Questions 250 - 254 of 2302

Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 2302 questions. Access all new questions- tracking exam pattern and syllabus. View the complete topic-wise distribution of questions. Unlimited Access, Unlimited Time, on Unlimited Devices!

View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 600.00 -OR-

How to register? Already Subscribed?

Question 250

Question

MCQ▾

Which one of the following NOT support practice of ethics in research?

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Disclosing the data subsets

b.

Restricting access to data instruments where the participant is identified

c.

Restricting access to participants identification

d.

Revealing information of participant only with written consent

Question 251

Appeared in Year: 2018 (UGC-NET Paper 1)

Question

MCQ▾

Variables in a cross -sectional research design are

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Interval and ratio

b.

Continuous and discrete

c.

Ordinal

d.

Nominal

Question 252

Experimental Studies ( Quasi Experimental and True Experimental Study) (New 2019)

Question

MCQ▾

A write up based on the study of a data of a region pertaining to a problem or issue there, is called

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

A research paper

b.

A thesis

c.

An article

d.

A project report

Question 253

Question

MCQ▾

The systematic identification, location and analysis of documents containing information related to research problem is called ________.

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Review of Literature

b.

Research plan

c.

Research hypothesis

d.

Research design

Question 254

Appeared in Year: 2018 (UGC-NET Paper 1)

Question

MCQ▾

The problem of ‘research ethics’ is concerned with which aspect of research activities? (July)

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Data analysis through qualitative or quantitative technique

b.

Defining the population of research

c.

Evidence based research reporting

d.

Following the prescribed format of a thesis

Developed by: