NTA-NET (Based on NTA-UGC) Philosophy (Paper-II): Questions 657 - 660 of 1674

Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1674 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. Subscription can be renewed yearly absolutely FREE! View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 550.00 or

How to register?

Question number: 657

» Western Ethics » Subjectivism, Cultural Relativism and Super-Naturalism » New 2019

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2016

MCQ▾

Question

Which one of the following is a statement of naturalistic Ethical theory? (July Paper-3)

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

A right action is one that is approved by God.

b.

A good is what a rational person desires.

c.

The good is desirable

d.

A right action is one that is approved by my conscience.

Question number: 658

» Logic-Formal and Symbolic » Symbolic Logic » Use of Symbols (New 2019)

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2016

MCQ▾

Question

If ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’ and ‘ ’ are all true then the truth-value of p and q will be: (August Paper-3)

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

p is false and q is true

b.

p and q are false

c.

p and q are true

d.

p is true and q is false

Question number: 659

» Modern Indian Thinkers » Vivekananda » Practical Vedanta

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2017

MCQ▾

Question

Who among the following holds the view that ‘space, time and causation are not metaphysical realities, they are mere forms’? (January Paper-2)

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Vivekananda

b.

J Krishna murti

c.

Tagore

d.

Radha Krishnan

Question number: 660

» Classical Western Philosophy » Sophists and Socrates » The Method of Dialectic

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2016

MCQ▾

Question

The purpose of Socratic method is to: (August Paper-3)

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Establish his mastery over the situation.

b.

Reject the importance of all particular judgments.

c.

Evolve such universal judgements that reject all clash of opinions.

d.

Evolve such universal judgements that work as common ground beneath the clash of opinions.

Developed by: