Constitutional Law of India (CBSE-NET (Based on NTA-UGC) Law (Paper-II)): Questions 275 - 279 of 298
Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 298 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.
Rs. 200.00 or
Question number: 275
» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties
Question
Which of the following clauses to Article 15 was added by the 93rd Constitutional Amendment, 2005?
Choices
| Choice (4) | Response | |
|---|---|---|
| a. | Article 15 (4) |
|
| b. | Article 15 (3) |
|
| c. | Article 15 (2) |
|
| d. | Article 15 (5) |
|
Question number: 276
» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties
Question
To which of the following is the doctrine of eclipse relevant to the laws and fundamental rights generally applicable?
Choices
| Choice (4) | Response | |
|---|---|---|
| a. | Post-constitutional laws |
|
| b. | Customary laws |
|
| c. | Pre-constitutional laws |
|
| d. | All of the above |
|
Question number: 277
» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties
Question
For the right to equality, it which case was it said by the Supreme Court that “equals should not be treated unlike and unlike should not be treated alike. Likes should be treated alike. “?
Choices
| Choice (4) | Response | |
|---|---|---|
| a. | Gauri Shankar vs Union of India |
|
| b. | Kesavananda Bharati vs Union of India |
|
| c. | Radha Charan vs Union of India |
|
| d. | Satbir Singh vs Union of India |
|
Question number: 278
» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties
Question
In a famous case, the Supreme Court explained that “An action per se arbitrary itself denies equality of protection by law” explaining the principle of equality. This case is the case of
Choices
| Choice (4) | Response | |
|---|---|---|
| a. | Sridhavan Singh vs State of Bihar |
|
| b. | Liladhar vs State of Rajasthan |
|
| c. | A L Kalra vs P and E Corporation of India, Ltd. |
|
| d. | Bhagat Ram vs State of Himachal Pradesh |
|
Question number: 279
» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties
Question
In which of the following cases has it been considered that if a penalty that is disproportionate to how grave the misconduct has been is applied, the same shall violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India?
Choices
| Choice (4) | Response | |
|---|---|---|
| a. | Subhash Verma vs State of Bihar |
|
| b. | Bhagat Ram vs State of Himachal Pradesh |
|
| c. | Muladhar Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh |
|
| d. | Vikram Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh |
|