CBSE-NET (UGC) Law (Paper-II & Paper-III): Questions 199 - 203 of 300

Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 300 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 250.00 or

Question number: 199

» Constitutional Law of India » Preamble

MCQ▾

Question

The first linguistic state of India was created in the year 1953. The state was

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

West Bengal

b.

Gujarat

c.

Madhya Pradesh

d.

Andhra Pradesh

Question number: 200

» Constitutional Law of India » Preamble

MCQ▾

Question

India has been given the name quasi-federal. In comparison to this, the countries of Canada, Australia and the United States of America were previously struck by the spirit of

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

Quasi-federalism

b.

Competitive federalism

c. Question does not provide sufficient data or is vague
d. None of the above

Question number: 201

» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties

MCQ▾

Question

In which of the following cases has the Supreme Court ruled that ‘Padma Bhushan’, ‘Bharat Ratna’ etc. do not come within the ambit of titles as specified under Article 18 (1)?

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

State of Karnataka vs Union of India

b.

Kesavananda Bharati vs Union of India

c.

Ajay Hasia vs Union of India

d.

Balaji Raghavan vs Union of India

Question number: 202

» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties

MCQ▾

Question

In a landmark case in the history of India concerning the right to equality, it was observed by the Supreme Court that “from a positivistic point of view, equality is antithetic to arbitrariness. ” Which case is this?

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

Sant Kabir vs Union of India

b.

Sridhavan Singh vs State of Bihar

c.

E P Royappa vs State of Tamil Nadu

d.

Liladhar vs State of Rajasthan

Question number: 203

» Constitutional Law of India » Fundamental Rights and Duties

MCQ▾

Question

In which of the following cases was it understood that any administrative direction without the force of law is not capable of restraining a fundamental right?

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

Bishan Dass vs State of Punjab

b.

Kharak Singh vs State of UP

c.

Satwant Singh vs A. P. O

d. All a. , b. and c. are correct

Sign In