NTA-NET (UGC-NET) History (06) Medieval Indian History-Political Developments Study Material (Page 20 of 99)

Choose Programs:

📹 Video Course 2024 (20 Lectures [19 hrs : 17 mins]): Offline Support

Rs. 100.00 -OR-

1 Month Validity (Multiple Devices)

Preview All LecturesDetails

⏳ 🎯 Online Tests (5 Tests [100 questions each]): NTA Pattern, Analytics & Explanations

Rs. 1000.00 -OR-

3 Year Validity (Multiple Devices)

Sample TestsDetailsSee Demo

🎓 Study Material (1168 Notes): 2024-2025 Syllabus

Rs. 1000.00 -OR-

3 Year Validity (Multiple Devices)

Topic-wise Notes & SampleDetails

🎯 2786 MCQs (& PYQs) with Full Explanations (2024-2025 Exam)

Rs. 650.00 -OR-

3 Year Validity (Multiple Devices)

CoverageDetailsSample Explanation

Help me Choose & Register (Watch Video) Already Subscribed?

Medieval Indian History: Decline of Slave Dynasty- Kaiqubad, Early Career and Administration, Conspiracy of Nizamuddin

Edit

Decline of Slave Dynasty

After the death of Balban his successors ruled over Delhi Sultanate for three years but during their regin the process of decline began due to the inefficiency of his successors. The following Sultans ruled after his death.

Kaiqubad (AD 1287 - 1290)

  • Balban wanted to make his eldest son Muhammad his successor but the premature death of the crown prince shattered all his hopes and he himself breathed his last due to this fatal shock.
  • The death of Balban not only proved fatal for the dynasty of the so-called slaves but also ended the grandeur of the Delhi Sultanate.
  • Balban declared Kai Khusrau his successor before his death. Comp…

… (643 more words) …

Subscribe (by clicking here) to view full notes and track progress.

Medieval Indian History: Bughra Khan՚s Coming to Delhi - Murder of Nizamuddin, Assassination of Kaikubad

Edit

Bughra Khan՚s Coming to Delhi

  • At the time of death of Balban, Bughra Khan was the Governor of Bengal.
  • Just after the death of his father, he assumed the title of Nasiruddin and declared his independence in Bengal, Although Bughra Khan was happy that his son had succeeded in Delhi but he was not prepared to accept the subordination of his son, and ruled independently in Bengal for son but when he became confident that Kaiqubad was an unworthy ruler and he could put the throne of Balban in danger, he decided to intervene in the politics of Delhi.
  • He warned his son through letters to mend his manners and to take personal interest in the affairs of the Sultanate but Kaiqubad was not move…

… (513 more words) …

Subscribe (by clicking here) to view full notes and track progress.