Law: Nature and Classification (CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) Legal-Aptitude): Questions 32 - 35 of 168

Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1064 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 450.00 or

Question number: 32

» Law: Nature and Classification

Appeared in Year: 2008

MCQ▾

Question

Right to travel is a fundamental right under:

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Article 12 of the Constitution

b.

Article 14 of the Constitution

c.

Article 19 of the Constitution

d.

Question does not provide sufficient data or is vague

Question number: 33

» Law: Nature and Classification

MCQ▾

Question

In which of the following cases was it laid down that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution?

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Sarla Mudgal case

b.

Shah Bano case

c.

T. M. A Pai Foundation case

d.

Re Berubari’s case

Question number: 34

» Law: Nature and Classification

Appeared in Year: 2015

Assertion-Reason▾

Assertion (Ꭺ)

The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible both to Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.

Reason (Ꭱ)

The members of both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha are eligible to be ministers of the Union Government.

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Ꭺ is true but Ꭱ is false

b.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are true and Ꭱ is the correct explanation of Ꭺ

c.

Ꭺ is false but Ꭱ is true

d.

Both Ꭺ and Ꭱ are false

Question number: 35

» Law: Nature and Classification

Appeared in Year: 2013

MCQ▾

Question

PRINCIPLES: Only the Parliament or the State Legislatures have the authority to enact laws on their own. No law made by a State can take away a person’s fundamental right.

FACTS: Parliament enacted a law, which according to a group of lawyers is violating the fundamental rights of traders. The group of lawyers filed a writ petition against the Parliament for enacting such law and requests the Court to quash the law and to direct the Parliament to make a new law.

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

No writ would lie against the Parliament as the Court has no authority to direct the Parliament to enact or re-enact a law.

b.

The Court can quash the existing law if it violates fundamental right and can direct to make a new law.

c.

The Court can quash the existing law if it violates fundamental right but cannot direct the Parliament to make a new law

d.

None of the above

f Page
Sign In