Criminal Law (CLAT Legal-Aptitude): Questions 68 - 70 of 88

Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1066 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 450.00 or

Question number: 68

» Criminal Law

Appeared in Year: 2010

MCQ▾

Question

Cr. PC stands for:

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

Criminal Proceedings Code

b.

Criminal Proceedings Court

c.

Crime Prevention Code

d.

Criminal Procedure Code

Question number: 69

» Criminal Law

Appeared in Year: 2010

MCQ▾

Question

FACTS: X, the servant of Y, takes a hundred rupee note from Y’s pocket and hides it under the carpet in the house of Y. X tells Z another servant of Y, about the currency note and both agree to share the money when the currency note is taken by X from the hiding place. Before X could recover the note, it was found by Y. Decide if an offence was committed and if so who committed the offence.

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

Only Z committed the offence

b.

X and Z committed the offence

c.

No offence was committed

d.

Only X committed the offence

Question number: 70

» Criminal Law

Appeared in Year: 2012

MCQ▾

Question

Principle: Nothing is an offence merely by reason of its being done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause harm, if it be done without any criminal intention to cause harm, and in good faith for the purpose of preventing or avoiding other harm to a person or property.

Facts: Mr. Sharman, the Captain of a steam vessel, suddenly and without any fault or negligence on his part, finds himself in such a position that, before he can stop his vessel, he must inevitably run down a boat B, with twenty or thirty passengers on board, unless he changes the course of his vessel, and that, by changing his course, he must incur the risk of running down a boat C with only two passengers on board and which he may possibly clear.

Choices

Choice (4) Response
a.

Sharman has committed no offence because this was done out of necessity

b.

This is a clear case of accident so Sharman cannot be held responsible

c.

Sharman can be held responsible for culpable homicide

d.

Sharman can be held responsible for the act of criminal negligence

Sign In