CLAT Legal-Aptitude: Questions 443 - 445 of 1066
Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1066 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.
Rs. 450.00 or
Question number: 443
Appeared in Year: 2014
PRINCIPLES: Whenever there is an invasion of a legal right, the person in whom the right is vested, is entitled to bring an action though he has suffered no actual loss or harm, and may recover damages (compensation).
FACTS: `A’ was a qualified voter for the Lok Sabha election. However, a returning officer wrongfully refused to take A’s vote. In spite of such wrongful refusal, the candidate, for whom `A’ wanted to vote, won the election. But, `A’ brought an action for damages:
Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?
Since no fundamental right of `A’ had been violated, therefore, as such, no compensation could be granted
No compensation could be granted, as `A’ had suffered no loss as his candidate won the election
Since legal right of `A’ had been violated, therefore, compensation should be granted
Since no legal right of `A’ had been violated, therefore, as such, no compensation could be granted
Question number: 444
As per the legal definition of libel, which of the following will not come within its ambit?
Question number: 445
Which of the following is the correct meaning of the legal term binding precedent?
Following the decisions set by higher courts
The binding of a decision of a court
The illegality of the decision
|d.||Question does not provide sufficient data or is vague|