CLAT Legal-Aptitude: Questions 385 - 387 of 1066
Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1066 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.
Rs. 450.00 or
Question number: 385
Appeared in Year: 2009
Husband and wife have a right to each other’s company. The right is called
Question number: 386
Appeared in Year: 2015
PRINCIPLE: A master is liable for the acts committed by his servant in the course of employment. FACT: Sanjay is a driver working in Brookebond and Co. One day, the Manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiance Ruhina waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car and soon thereafter; the car somersaulted due to the negligence of Sanjay. Ruhina was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Brookebond and Co.
Brookebond and Co. , shall be liable, because Sanjay was in the course of employment at the time of accident
Ruhina got into the car at her own risk, and therefore, she cannot sue anybody.
Brookebond and Co. , shall not be liable, Sanjay was not in the course of employment when he took Ruhina inside the car.
|d.||All of the above|
Question number: 387
Which of the following is the meaning of the legal term parte non comparente?
With justice in case
With no right of appeal
Party not appeared
All parties have appeared