CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) Legal-Aptitude: Questions 359 - 363 of 1064

Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1064 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 450.00 or

Question number: 359

» Legal Terms

MCQ▾

Question

As per the legal definition of nuisance, to make it a right, a period of a total of how many years must expire?

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

30

b.

40

c.

20

d.

10

Question number: 360

» Legal Terms

MCQ▾

Question

Which of the following is the meaning of the legal term venditioni exponas?

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

A bad law

b.

You are to stay out

c.

You are to expose for sale

d.

You are not to expose for sale

Question number: 361

» Legal Terms

MCQ▾

Question

Which of the following is the meaning of the legal term non consessit?

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

It was bad in law

b.

It has no response

c.

He did not grant

d.

It is uncertain

Question number: 362

» Criminal Law

Appeared in Year: 2010

MCQ▾

Question

Release of prisoner before completion of sentence is called:

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Lease

b.

Release

c.

Acquittal

d.

Parole

Question number: 363

» Criminal Law

Appeared in Year: 2015

MCQ▾

Question

PRINCIPLES: ignorantia juris non excusat and ignorantia facit excusat

FACTS: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th Nov 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34 kegs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the ‘Manifest for transit’. On 26th Nov 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that the gold must be declared in the Manifest of the aircraft.

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.

b.

George will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.

c.

George cannot be prosecuted because it is a mistake of fact which is excusable.

d.

George’s liability would depend on the discretion of the Court.

f Page
Sign In