CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) Legal-Aptitude: Questions 303 - 308 of 1064

Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 1064 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 450.00 or

Question number: 303

» Legal Terms

MCQ▾

Question

In law, there is often talked about an act which twisted, crooked and unlawful. It is called

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Crime

b.

Tort

c.

Criminal offence

d.

All of the above

Question number: 304

» Law: Nature and Classification

Appeared in Year: 2010

MCQ▾

Question

Ex parte decision means a decision given

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

After hearing both parties

b.

After observing proper procedure

c.

Without proper procedure

d.

Without hearing the opponent

Question number: 305

» Law: Nature and Classification

Appeared in Year: 2010

MCQ▾

Question

Corroborative evidence means:

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Evidence that proves the guilt of an accused person

b.

Evidence of a person that supports the accused

c.

Evidence which supports other evidence

d.

Main evidence in case

Question number: 306

» Legal Terms

MCQ▾

Question

Which of the following is the meaning of the legal term in pari delicto?

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Agency

b.

In equal fault

c.

Not prohibited

d.

Law enforcement

Question number: 307

» Tort

Appeared in Year: 2009

MCQ▾

Question

When the master is held liable for the wrongful act of his servant, the liability is called

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Tortious liability

b.

Vicarious liability

c.

Absolute liability

d.

Strict liability

Question number: 308

» Tort

Appeared in Year: 2013

MCQ▾

Question

PRINCIPLES: res ipsa loquitur i. e. the thing speaks for itself. FACTS: Seema got herself operated for the removal of her uterus in the defendant’s hospital, as there was diagnosed to be a cyst in one of her ovaries. Due the negligence of the surgeon, who performed the operation, abdominal pack was left in her abdomen. The same was removed by a second surgery.

Choices

Choice (4) Response

a.

Surgeon cannot be held responsible because it is merely a human error.

b.

Surgeon will be responsible and Seema need not to prove surgeon’s negligence because presence of abdominal pack in her abdomen is sufficient proof therefor.

c.

Surgeon can be held responsible but Seema will have to prove in the court of law that the surgeon was grossly negligent.

d.

None of the above

f Page
Sign In