AILET (All India Law Entrance Test) Legal-Aptitude: Questions 179 - 182 of 254

Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 254 questions. Access all new questions- tracking exam pattern and syllabus. View the complete topic-wise distribution of questions. Unlimited Access, Unlimited Time, on Unlimited Devices!

View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 200.00 -OR-

How to register? Already Subscribed?

Question 179

Appeared in Year: 2019

Question

MCQ▾

Who is heading the five-member committee set up to examine the issues related to framing of a proper, structured scheme for providing of Insurance cover to the advocates and also suggest modalities for the implementation of such scheme?

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Ravi Shankar Prasad

b.

Anand Patel

c.

Amrinder Khuller

d.

Alok Srivastava

Question 180

Appeared in Year: 2019

Question

MCQ▾

In February, 2019 a Public Interest Litigation has been lodged with the High Court of ________, wherein a 11 -year-old boy has sought ban on the PUBG game in all the schools in the State.

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Delhi

b.

Allahabad

c.

Bombay

d.

Karnataka

Question 181

Appeared in Year: 2019

Question

MCQ▾

The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Bill, 2019 seeks to amend ________ to Include ________

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Article 15 and 29; Other Backward Class

b.

Article 29 and 30; Economically weaker Sections

c.

Article 15 and 30; Other Backward Class

d.

Article 15 and 16; Economically weaker sections

Question 182

Appeared in Year: 2019

Question

MCQ▾

Directions: Apply the legal principles lo the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.

(1) The Tort of Negligence is a legal wrong that is suffered by someone at the hands of another who fails to take proper care to avoid what a reasonable person would regard as a foreseeable risk.

(2) The test of liability requires that the harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant՚s conduct, a relationship of proximity must exist and it must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability.

(3) Volenti non-fit injuria is defence to action in negligence.

Facts: In a sad incident, 95 fans of a Football club died in a stampede in the Nehru Stadium. The court has decided that the accident was caused due to the negligence of the Police in permitting too many supporters to crowd in one part of the stadium. Now, a suit is filed by Harman and several other people against the Commissioner of State Police. Harman and the other claimants had relatives who were caught up in the Nehru Stadium disaster. The disaster was broadcast on live television, where several claimants alleged, they had witnessed friends and relatives die. Others were present in the stadium o had heard about the events in other ways. All claimed damages for the psychiatric harm they suffered as a result. Determine whether, for the purposes of establishing liability in negligence, those who suffer purely psychiatric harm from witnessing an event at which they are not physically present are sufficiently proximate for a duty to be owed, and thus can be said to be reasonably within the contemplation of the tortfeasor?

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Police is not liable because the duty of care towards Harman and others will be breached if they were present at the event and the harm caused was being foreseeable. The liability towards victims who are not physically present is only in certain exceptional circumstances.

b.

Police is not liable because the incident was an accident and supporters were there by their own free will.

c.

Police is liable for only for the death of 95 fans bums and not for the psychiatric harm to relatives of deceased fans which happened due to their own delicate mental condition.

d.

Police is liable for all of the consequences of their negligence because they could reasonably foresee the injury. The liability towards victims who are not physically present is also there in all circumstances.

Developed by: