AILET Legal-Aptitude: Questions 47 - 49 of 152
Get 1 year subscription: Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 152 questions. Access all new questions we will add tracking exam-pattern and syllabus changes. View Sample Explanation or View Features.
Rs. 150.00 or
Question number: 47
Appeared in Year: 2012
Who allocates portfolios among the Ministers?
|b.||President on the recommendation of the Prime Minister|
Chairperson of Ruling Political Party
Question number: 48
Appeared in Year: 2015
LEGAL PRINCIPLES: The state shall make special Iaws for the upliftment of citizens of the country, and these laws can be made for the benefit of any specific caste, class or sex of people living in the society.
FACTUAL SITUATION: The state of Hindu Pradesh comes out with a law which provides for reservation to Muslims in all government and government aided institutions. This law is challenged in the High Court of Hindu Pradesh, as being arbitrary and contrary to the established laws. Can the challenge be successful?
Yes, since people from other religions would also start making such demands which would jeopardize the unity and integrity of the country.
No, since the state has the right to make special laws for the upliftment of the citizens of the country.
Yes, since the state has not been mandated to make reservation, based on a person’s religion.
No, since the Government cannot neglect the minorities.
Question number: 49
Appeared in Year: 2015
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The occupier of a premise owes a duty of care to all his invitees and visitors.
FACTUAL SITUATION: Lalit was running a dairy from his house. People used a part of his farm as shortcut to get to a nearby railway station. Lalit who did not approve of this, put up a notice that “Trespassers will be prosecuted”. However, since a number of these people were also his customers he tolerated them. One day a person who was using this short cut was attacked by a bull belonging to the farm. The injured person filed a suit against him.
Lalit is liable for having kept a bull on his farm.
Lalit, is not liable to the people other than his customers.
Lalit is not liable in view of the clear notice against trespassers.
Lalit is liable because in fact he allowed the people to use his premises.