AILET (All India Law Entrance Test) Legal-Aptitude: Questions 43 - 45 of 152

Access detailed explanations (illustrated with images and videos) to 152 questions. Access all new questions- tracking exam pattern and syllabus changes. View the complete topic-wise distribution of questions. Unlimited Access for Unlimited Time!

View Sample Explanation or View Features.

Rs. 150.00 or

How to register?

Question number: 43

» Law: Nature and Classification

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2012

MCQ▾

Question

The Constitution of India does not mention the post of

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

The Deputy Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly

b.

The Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha

c.

The Deputy Prime Minister

d.

The Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha

Question number: 44

» Law: Nature and Classification

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2012

MCQ▾

Question

The maximum duration of the zero hour in Lok Sabha can be

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Unspecified

b.

One hour

c.

Two hours

d.

30 minutes

Question number: 45

» Contract Law

Edit

Appeared in Year: 2014

MCQ▾

Question

LEGAL PRINCIPLE: Every agreement, by which any party is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary tribunals, is void to that extent.

FACTUAL SITUATION: Feroz and Pinto entered into an agreement for rendering certain services. As per the prevailing law, the agreement may be enforced either at Jaipur or Udaipur. The agreement itself, however, specifies that upon breach, the parties can only approach courts at Jaipur. Feroz breaches the contract and Pinto, being a resident of Udaipur, would like to sue him in Udaipur. He challenged the validity of the clause.

Choices

Choice (4)Response

a.

Pinto will fail as he was of sound mind while entering into contract and having accepted it, he cannot now deny his obligation.

b.

Pinto will succeed as the contract does not allow him to institute any legal proceedings in any court or tribunal in Udaipur.

c.

Pinto will succeed as Feroz had made him suffer and the law must take his convenience into account and allow him to sue in Udaipur.

d.

Pinto will fail as the contract does not restrain him from instituting legal proceedings in Jaipur.

Developed by: